David A. Cook CoffeeShop Weekly November 15 2019
Former ambassador Marie Yovanovitch comitted purjury today first claiming that the Obama administration never brought up Burisma or Hunter Biden. but Later she stated that when she was prepping for her confirmation heraring, the Obama administration was concerned enough about the association between Burimsa and Hunter Biden that they peppered her with questions about it. She also stated in her opening statement that she had nothing to add to the discussion about the phone call between Trump and Zelensky, the discussion surrounding the phone call, or the discussion concerning the delay of military aid because she had no first hand knowledge of any of it. Not really sure why she was there other than to play the victim of big bad Trump who tweeted about her distastorous stint as ambassador while she was tesifying. Of course the democrats claim his tweet was an impeachable offense. How can people be so gulible to believe anything these jokers say.
What Amb Yovanovitch said earlier:— Tommy Pigott (@TCPigott) November 15, 2019
“although I have met former Vice President Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me” pic.twitter.com/AWhrogxFpN
Under direct questioning she admits that she knows of no bribery or criminal activity by the President.
During the hearing, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) yielded his time to Stefanik who started to question Yovanovitch before being cut off by Schiff.
Once again, Adam Schiff flat out REFUSES to let duly elected Members of Congress ask questions to the witness, simply because we are Republicans. His behavior is unacceptable and he continues to abuse his Chairmanship. Watch □□ pic.twitter.com/qm9Uj8tiHO— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) November 15, 2019
Amanda Prestigiacomo of The Daily Wire is reporting that Republican New York Rep. Elise Stefanik was finally able to get her questioning in of former Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch on Friday afternoon, after being repeatedly shut down from speaking by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA).
The effective questioning from Ms. Stefanik acted to underscore the fact that ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, to emphasize the Biden family’s shady business dealings within Ukraine, and finally, to highlight President Donald Trump’s support of Ukraine, particularly in relation to the lack of support provided under the Obama administration.
David A. Cook CoffeeShop Weekly November 15, 2019
If you will notice, the new word to describe Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky is that he was attempting to “Bribe” him. Because he attempted to bribe him, President Trump must be impeached. Let’s forget about the fact that no bribery took place, that simply doesn’t matter. They use the word because the term is used when describing the constitutional statement concerning impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Article 2 Section 4
Therefore, you will begin to hear the word more often in the impeachment hearings currently taking place. There is a problem here, however. To be convicted of a crime the crime needs to be committed. And this is where the Breaking News comes in.
A statement from the Ukrainian Foreign Minister is throwing cold water on the bribery accusation. He stated in an interview that U.S. Ambassador Gordon Sondland never told them or even implied to them that there was a link between the delay in military aid and the investigations into Burisma Holdings where Hunter Biden sat on the Board of Directors or any other investigation. Minister Prystaiko on Thursday told journalists in Kyiv that:
“Ambassador Sondland did not tell us, and did not tell me exactly, about the relation between the [military] assistance and the investigations. You should ask him. I do not recall any conversation with me as with foreign minister. It was not we, the Ukrainian officials (who were told this),”
“I have never seen a direct link between investigations and security assistance. Yes, investigations were mentioned, you know, in a presidential conversation. But there was no clear connection between these events.”
Where to begin? Schiff’s opening statement was just as bogus as this whole impeachment is. He told a falsehood about what the transcripts said. He stated that President Trump asked president Zelenski to investigate the Bidens as a favor which is not true. In fact, the Bidens were not mention until a page and a half after Trump mentioned a "favor". This man is incapable of telling the truth, which is why so many on the left love him.
Wednesday will mark the beginning of the House impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. Adam Schiff, the unethical and fraudulent Chairman of the Intelligence Committee will be the dictator over these proceedings. The Trump haters will be cheering him on along with all other American hating, constitutional loathing, justice despising, truth avoiding ingrates. These proceeding should disgust every American. This is a political assassination of a President, which started before his inauguration. Hate Trump or love him, how these proceedings are going forth should set you back on your heels.
When the House voted to start, rather continue their impeachment inquiry, the resolution included stipulations that the Republicans needed to seek permission from Schiff to call witnesses, or subpoena documents. Schiff has the right under the resolution to deny any and all witnesses requested by the Republicans as well as any documents they would like to use. But surely, he would never do such a thing since he his pronouncing that this will be a process with full transparency.
David A. Cook CoffeeShop Weekly November 8, 2019
Elizabeth Warren has finally come out with her plan to pay for her Medicaid-For-All (MFA) program. She is giving an estimate that her plan will cost $52 trillion over ten years. She is denying that the middle class will have to pay anything extra in taxes, because by raising tax rates on billionaires and implementing her wealth tax, the revenue the government will acquire will more than pay for her plan. There’s just one problem, its not true. When I say it is not true, I don’t mean her tax plan has miscalculated the cost or the amount of revenue she believes she can collect. I mean it is absolutely without question or argument untrue. It is an outright lie and she knows it.
To give a little Perspective on this let’s look at some numbers that we will use in evaluating Warren’s claims. In the last fiscal year, the U.S. government had $4.4 trillion in spending while bringing in $3.5 trillion of income (Included in the $3.5 trillion budget is $407 billion for Medicaid. For simplicity we are leaving those dollars in the budget as they do not undermine the conclusion of this article.). In Forbes list of the world's billionaires for 2019, the list included 2,153 billionaires with a total net wealth of $8.7 trillion. UBS/PwC found 585 billionaires in the United States worth $3.1 trillion combined. Wealth-X counted 680 U.S. billionaires worth $3.2 trillion combined. Total income for all of the U.S. population was $17.6 trillion. Forbes, USB/PwC, and Wealth-X numbers are estimates, albeit well calculated estimates. All other figures are taken from the US Census Bureau, Congressional Budget Office, the IRS and Statista.
So, what do these number mean? First let’s start with costs. Warren’s plan will cost, by her estimates, $5.2 trillion per year. As stated above, our current revenues equal $3.5 trillion with spending coming in at $4.4 trillion. This means that this one program alone will not only far exceed our current total revenues by $1.7 trillion (33%), it will exceed our current total spending by $800 billion (16%). Lizzie’s one program will cost $1.7 trillion more than all of the revenues brought into the U.S. treasury. People, including myself, have complained about our spending $800 billion more than we brought in. Her program more than doubles that amount, and we haven’t even gotten to her other proposals!
Now to her lie.
She is saying that by raising the tax rate on the billionaires and by subjecting them to her wealth tax, as unconstitutional as it may be, that she can pay for this program. Keep in mind she is saying this about some of her other “plans” as well. So, is this possible? No! We will take the highest numbers mentioned above to help Pocahontas out. In the U.S. there are 680 billionaires. They have a combined worth of $3.2 trillion dollars. I bet you can see the problem already. If her income tax increase and wealth tax on these 680 people combine for a 100% tax rate, she would only bring in $3.2 trillion, that’s $2 trillion short of funding her Medicaid-for-all. In other words, if she confiscated every penny from these 680 billionaires, she would only be able to fund this program for less than eight months. Let’s take it one step further. If she was able to take every single penny from all the billionaires in the world, she would only be able to fund this plan for 20 months.
Looking at this another way, would be looking at the total income of the U.S. population. In 2018, total income earned by the U.S. population was $17.6 trillion. If you consider the current level of spending of $4.4 trillion, plus the MFA at $5.2 trillion that totals $9.6 trillion. That is 55% of what the total population earned, not their taxable income. Now to be fair to Mrs. “I’ve got a plan”, if we deduct the $3.2 trillion that we got from taking all the wealth from U.S. billionaires, you still have $6.4 trillion to come up with. That means there would have to be, at the very least, an effective tax rate of 36% on every American worker. If your taxable income is $50,000 the government will take and keep $18,000 of it. And that is just calculating in one program. It is not taking into account free college tuition ($79B per year), free childcare ($2B per year for 12M children), school loan forgiveness ($1.6T), or any other program that the left is looking to put in place.
When we begin to contemplate these costs, we can readily see that there simply isn’t enough money to pay for this leftist utopia. So, you see, the idea of making the rich pay their fair share goes to the wayside when you consider the cost of these entitlement programs. You can take all the billionaire’s money and you will still get stuck with a huge tax increase on every working American. Of course, you can then say, “take all the millionaire’s money”, but eventually it will come down to taking all of your money. Besides, there are too many millionaire politicians for them to ever go after their own money.
Ladies and gentlemen, she knows this and is lying about it anyway. She is not a dumb person; in fact, she is very intelligent. This is the problem with all the leftist programs, they simply cannot be funded. They sell their version of nirvana to the masses and they tell them that the rich can pay for it. Fact is, they simply can’t. Truth be told, all of us can’t.
Coffee Shop Weekly has been making the case that the transcripts of the call between President Trump and President Zelensky revealed no quid pro quo. We stand by that position and believe that the over all impeachment process being brought against Trump is a politically motivated act of revenge for Trump beating Clinton in the 2016 election. Nothing more and nothing less.
With that said, according to legal scholars quid pro quo is a staple of presidential negotiation and cannot be assumed to be a high crime or misdemeanor. In addition, Trump's request for Ukraine to investigate possible corruption as it relates to both Joe and Hunter Biden and Burisma was also well within his legal right regardless if Joe Biden was a possible presidential opponent.
As reported by the Washington Times, the alleged quid pro quo transaction at the heart of House Democrats’ case against President Trump is closer to typical Oval Office deal-making than a high crime or misdemeanor worthy of impeachment, legal scholars say.
All this discussion of quid pro quo is really a smokescreen,” said Robert G. Natelson, a constitutional scholar with the Independence Institute, a libertarian-leaning think tank in Denver. “Even if it were a quid pro quo, I think it is rather clearly neither a felony nor a misdemeanor.”
The Constitution’s criteria for impeachment — treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors — refer to felonies and serious breaches of fiduciary duty or the obligation to act in the best interest of the U.S., he said.
“It is not a breach of fiduciary duty for a president to make aid to another country conditional, and it is certainly not a breach of fiduciary duty for the president to ask the other country to investigate possible involvement in an American election,” Mr. Natelson said.
CoffeeShop Weekly November 7, 2019
As reported by Rick Moran for PJ Media, a rule that enabled doctors and nurses to refuse to perform abortions for religious reasons was tossed out by a federal judge because it was too "coercive." The judge invokes "discrimination," which apparently trumps religious liberty, and workers are coerced into performing abortions. I fear that this is the future of the republic as some "rights" will supersede others, leading to an erosion of individual liberties.
As reported by Matt Walsh at The Daily Wire, prominent abortionist Leroy Carhart dispels one of the biggest arguments of pro-choice minions when he basically says fetus is just another word for baby. He goes on to say that he has no problem killing a baby if it is in the mother's uterus. He goes on to say that when it comes to the health of the mother that could very well mean emotional health in which case depression could be just cause to kill their unborn child. When pressed about killing a fully formed viable baby he say that "the baby has no input in this". as far as the baby is concerned "It makes no difference if they're born or not."He lays all this out in a short clip less than one minute long.
In this clip, prominent abortionist Leroy Carhart:— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) November 5, 2019
-says depression qualifies as a “medical need” for late term abortion
-says it’s ok to kill babies anytime because to them “it makes no difference if theyre born or not”
-admits he “kills babies”
Live Action also posted a longer video on the serial killer doctor which is below. They show pictures of a birthday celebration in which one of his gifts is a sign that says “Even on my worst days, I’M KILLING IT.” Of course the knowing what we know about this man the words "Killing It" take on a whole new meaning. The video is worth the watch and Live Action's article is worth the read.
An employee at ABC News recorded a video of anchor Amy Robach talking on a hot mic to her producer revealing she had the story on sex offender and trafficker Jeffrey Epstein three years ago and her network killed her investigative report. "We had everything" she says. Pressure from "The Palace" referring to the royal family, and others caused ABC News to squash the story. According to Robaach they had damning evidence on Epstein, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew. Robach also says she is 100% sure that Epstein was killed rather than committing suicide. "He made his living blackmailing people ... Yup, there were a lot of men in those planes. A lot of men who visited that island, a lot of powerful men who came into that apartment.”
Here is the release from Project Veritas:
Newly revealed footage leaked by an ABC insider has exposed how network executives rejected allegations against Jeffrey Epstein years ago, even though there was content regarding the merit of those claims in-hand.
Amy Robach, ‘Good Morning America’ Co-Host and Breaking News Anchor at ABC, explains how a witness came forward years ago with information pertaining to Epstein, but Disney-owned ABC News refused to air the material for years. Robach vents her anger in a “hot mic” moment with an off-camera producer, explaining that ABC quashed the story in it’s early stages. “I’ve had this interview with Virginia Roberts (Now Virginia Guiffre) [alleged Epstein victim]. We would not put it on the air. Um, first of all, I was told “Who’s Jeffrey Epstein. No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story.”
She continues, “The Palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.”
Robach goes on to express she believes that Epstein was killed in prison saying, “So do I think he was killed? 100% Yes, I do…He made his whole living blackmailing people… Yup, there were a lot of men in those planes. A lot of men who visited that Island, a lot of powerful men who came into that apartment.”
Robach repeats a prophetic statement purportedly made by Attorney Brad Edwards “…[T]here will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known,” and Disgustedly Robach states “I had it all three years ago.”
Project Veritas intends to continue its investigation into corruption in the Mainstream Media. We encourage that Brave insiders at these organizations come forward with any information they have, so that the public knows what is really going on within these media companies.
The left-wing selective fact checking group PolitiFacts is up to their old trick of deceiving the public about statements made by conservatives. Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley was given a “Mostly False” rating after she sent an email concerning the Green New Deal. She said candidates who supported it “touted everything from putting limits on red meat consumption, to promoting abortion in third world countries to control the population!” In order to make Haley look like she was promoting a false narrative, PolitiFacts, took a statement from Bernie Sanders, which Haley was referring to, and only reported part of the statement, omitting the portion of Sanders statement in which he touted abortion/birth control to mitigate population growth in third world nations. They then falsely claimed that Haley was saying that the Green New Deal was espousing abortion and birth control – which she clearly was not doing.
David A. Cook CoffeeShop Weekly October 2019
I'm sure many of you have heard or read about this, but here goes. As much as it sometimes pains me I must give kudos when kudos are due. Former president Obama, speaking at an event for the Obama Foundation Summit, called out the "Woke" generation explaining that everything isn't always black and white and sometime good people who do goods things may have something not so good in their past. He said that the purity test for everyone is not a good thing and that young people really need to get over it. So, it is thumbs up for Mr. Obama. I know,. some for you are saying yeah, well he always throws stones at his opponents and that may be true, but what he is saying is right on. See video below.
Nancy Pelosi, in a failed attempt to look heart broken, grieved or reluctant over the vote to proceed with the impeachment inquiry, or should I say Inquisition of President Trump, said the following : “Nobody — I doubt anybody in this place — or anybody that you know comes to Congress to take the oath of office, comes to Congress to impeach the President of the United States,” No sooner did she say it and Benny Johnson, of Turning Point USA, posted on Twitter a quick video showing just how wrong she was. Keep in mind, these are just a few of the many.
David A. Cook CoffeeShop Weekly October 2019
The news was all a buzz about the testimony of Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman. The left is calling it a bombshell, one Democrat said it was sea change in the impeachment process. On and on it goes when in fact we have heard all this before. Vindman heard the call and was concerned about what he heard. Although some of his conclusion are contradictory to facts, he gave what he thought was an accurate account for what he heard and felt about it. Trust me, the selective leaks of testimony will continue. But there are three things that remain standing upon which none of the allegations against Trump can hold water as long as they remain. I have been saying this for weeks now, but it is more obvious at this point than ever before. Unless these three facts can be proven wrong as it relates to the current path of the democratic impeachment craze you can evaluate almost any testimony irrelevant.
As reported by National Review, the Massachusetts senator has challenged and possibly overtaken former vice president Joe Biden as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, largely based on having a plan for the government to tackle every problem facing this country, no matter how big or how small, from issues with military housing to Puerto Rican debt to climate change.
The price tag for this massive expansion of government is enormous. Much of the attention in recent weeks has been focused on Warren’s embrace of Medicare for All, which she refuses to admit would require an increase in middle-class taxes. Even Vermont senator Bernie Sanders has conceded that such proposals, which would cost $30–40 trillion over 10 years, cannot be financed without tax hikes. Warren’s refusal to address this obvious fact makes her look less like a would-be policy wonk and more like a typical politician.
If you ever wondered about the democrat party having animus towards police officers, and listening to Obama criticize the police for eight years didn't get the message through to you then listen to this. Bernie sanders was asked by a black student, "If I were your son what advice would you give me next time I am pulled over by a police officer?" Bernie's first response was to get the officer's name. Then he says that he should respect what the officer is doing so he doesn't get shot in the back of the head. Lastly he say to make sure the body cam is on during the stop. If ever their was a recipe for disaster, Bernie just gave it. He then goes on to bad talk police like the majority of them are bad people and racist.
If I were asked such a question I would have said speak to the officer with respect, do whatever they ask you to do, and you will drive away without incident. The video is below, but it is hard to watch since Bernie can't say respect the officer because it is a hard job that he is doing. No, Bernie has to try to bolster the false allegations of blacks being pulled over for the sole reason to cause harm to black people. The data doesn't support any of this but that never stopped a democrat from venting their discuss for police. Also notice the look on Bernie's face after he makes his remarks. It's like he doesn't know what he just said.
CoffeeShop Weekly October 2019
As reported by The Daily Wire, former Vice President Joe Biden claims in a newly released campaign video that he met with the families of all the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, but a victim’s brother disputed that claim.
After police pretty much blew off the victim of an abortion doctor pulling a gun on him and after out crys and press coverage, the Phoenix Police have arrested the doctor on charges of aggravated assault.
Democrats in general and Joe Biden in particular came down on President Trump because he referred to the impeachment attempt as a lynching. Trump tweeted:
“So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights. All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here – a lynching. But we will WIN!”
Joe Biden was quick to react to Trumps tweet by tweeting himself:
“Impeachment is not "lynching," it is part of our Constitution. Our country has a dark, shameful history with lynching, and to even think about making this comparison is abhorrent. It's despicable”.
Keeping this outrage in mind, let take a look back at some of the democrats that have made similar statements.
In 2008, Jerry Nadler said:
“I am the president’s defender in the sense that I haven’t seen anything yet that would rise, in my opinion, to the level of impeachable offense. … I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob.”
In 1998, concerning the Clinton Impeachment, Jim McDermott said:
“We’re taking a step down the road to becoming a political Lynch Mob… We are going to find a rope find a tree and ask a bunch of questions later…”
In 1998, Charley Rangel referred to Clinton’s impeachment as a
“lynch mob mentality, that says this man has to go.”
While Biden and so many democrats, including AOC have expressed their shock over Trumps remarks, Tom Elliott presented a great compilation of democrats using the same analogy concerning the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Watch below:
Their hypocrisy knows no bounds. This is why when they talk, reasonable people stop listening.
You may have heard about the train commuters taking matters into their own hands when Extinction Rebellion protesters climbed on the train preventing it from leaving. You may have seen the angry man who was being prevented from going to work, strip protesters of their banner and chase them away. But now In & Out Burger employees have gotten into the act. When protesters entered their store disrupting their customers, they simply removed them. As always the protesters are claiming to be the victims. They claim cruel and unusual punishment and that they have the right to disrupt a place of business. Never mind it is private property. We have posted some of the videos of each of these occurrences however be warned - very harsh language. While we don't condone violence, we think it is appropriate that these radicals realize they cannot simply infringe on other people's rights in order to exercise their own.
As reported in Faithwire, in video "footage released Friday afternoon, it appears an abortion doctor pointed a firearm toward a pro-life demonstrator from inside his vehicle as he left a clinic in Phoenix earlier this month".
"Apologia Church, the group behind the pro-life demonstration at the Acacia Women’s Center on Thursday, Oct. 10, posted the video to YouTube, urging viewers to contact the Phoenix Police Department to demand action be taken against Dr. Ronald Yunis, the physician who allegedly pulled a gun on protester Elvis Kesto".
Below is the video, and it is clear that he did in fact pull a gun. When Mr. Kesto went to the poice station the day it happen police filed charges but did not investigate. it was only after Kesto called police when Dr. Yunis came back to the clinic the following week did police respond. However, police who arrived on the scene said they weren't sure what the object was that was in theYunis's hand. Kestco then asked for a supervisor. When the supervisor showed up he also refused to acknowledge that it was a gun that Yunis pointed at Kesto. Mr. Kesto then went and spoke to other police officers not invloved in the complaint, and asked them what they thought it was. Everyone of them said "It looks like a gun". In addition the Dr. Yunis told police he doesn't cvarry a gun in his car and the police had no interest in looking inside the doctors car to verify. I assure you if the tables were turned and it was a pro-lifer pulling a gun on a pro-chice person they would have been in cuffs before the sun went down. If the facts are what my lying eyes are seeing, this is an outrage.
The story about the 1972 accident that took the lives of Joe Biden’s wife Neilia Biden and his 13-month-old daughter is absolutely heart wrenching. This tragic tale is something that one would never wish on their worse enemy. The grief and pain that Senator Biden suffered and had to endure is beyond imagining. To this I think any rational person would agree. However, it was the rewriting and weaponizing of this story along with the intentional malice that Biden showed in doing it that is at the heart of this report.
A top U.S. diplomat shot down a favorite anti-Trump talking point yesterday when he told Congress that the Obama administration, led by then–Vice President Joe Biden, orchestrated the firing of the controversial Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating a notoriously corrupt energy firm connected to the Biden family. George Kent, deputy assistant secretary in the State Department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, directly contradicts the “international community” narrative.
Read More Here & Here
The office of Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) announced early Thursday morning that the congressman has died due to complications concerning “longstanding health challenges.”
Cummings, who served as the chairman of the prestigious U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform, represented Maryland’s 7th Congressional District for more than two decades. He was elected to his seat 12 times by overwhelming majorities, never receiving less than two-thirds of the vote.
The Washington Examiner is reporting that Democrat House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff reportedly pressed U.S. special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker in a secret meeting on October 3 to say that President Donald Trump pressured Ukrainian officials to investigate former Vice President and current Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.“Volker denied that was the case, noting that Ukrainian leaders did not even know the aid was being withheld.
In all honesty, I do not like Alisyn Camerota at all. She is as dishonest as the day is long and has been caught lying on numerous occasions. But now that Beto (Robert Francis) O’Rourke has let the cat out of the bag about the Democrats real agenda of gun confiscation, Beto is getting his head handed to him. Camerota does a really nice job here pointing out the fallacy of his policy. The law is to stop mass murders and yet he admits mass murders won’t obey the law. He says, “I don’t know that you make any law or stop making any law because you fear some people will not follow the law.” But the law he is recommending is meant to stop the people who kill people, who he admits won’t follow the law to begin with. So what good is the law? Okay, now I’m making myself dizzy!
No matter what you call it, gun confiscation, mandatory buy back, it all the same, the Democrats want to take your guns. They use language to throw you off the scent like buy back programs, or national registry to make it look less imposing, but the bottom line is they don’t want you to own a gun. You will notice in the video below how Beto is always calling these rifles "weapons of war", guns designed for the "battle field". None of that is true, but it paints a picture that supports their narrative and fools the American people. Ever notice when they talk about the illegal immigration problem, they always call it immigration. Why? because anyone who thinks somewhat rationally knows that the concern is over people coming to the country illegally not legally. But by always using the word immigration they lump it all together to make those on the right look like they are anti-immigrant rather than citizens who oppose people coming into the country illegally. And when they are pressed on this, they call them undocumented or refugees. They never use the legal terms illegal or alien.
The same is true here. They want a "buy back program" and a "gun registry". Why? So the government will know who has a gun and what kind of gun. Why? So they can more easily come for it when they get to the confiscation or the mandatory buy back step of their plan. No matter how the Democratic candidates frame it, it is all about getting your guns. First the ARs and AKs, and then all semi-automatics, and then … This is their goal, which is why Beto is getting a spanking for letting the rest of us know what we have always suspected.
Judge Vacates Obamacare Rule Forcing Doctors To Perform Sex Change Surgeries
The Christian Post is reporting that a "judge in Texas has struck down an Obama-era federal regulation that would have required healthcare providers and insurers to perform gender-transition procedures and abortions even if they go against their medical judgment or violate religious convictions."
They go on to say "U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor, an appointee of President George W. Bush, vacated a 2016 Obamacare mandate that critics feared could have forced faith-based doctors out of work if they refused to perform gender-transition procedures or abortions on patients referred to them."
The Incomprehensible Joe Biden
CNN Exposed Part 2
Since the 2016 election, the violence of the left has increasingly gotten worse. Despite all the talk about far right violence, the left has almost an exclusive in harassing and physically assaulting people with whom they disagree. Alpha News MN complied a video demonstrating the violence and hate of these cowardly leftist, outside the Trump Minnesota rally.
WARNING: STRONG LANGUAGE. We would not normally post a video with such foul language, however, the reality of what is happening around us needs to be presented in an unedited form to shock our sensibilities and awake us to the fact that the left is out to destroy our nation and as you will see and hear in this video, they have no problem presenting just that.
Project Veritas Releases NEW VIDEO CNN Exposed Again
A CNN staffer, apparently tired of what he was seeing at CNN, decide to wire himself up with a hidden camera and begin recording his meetings and interactions with other employees at CNN, as well as the weekly meetings with CNN president Jeff Zucker’ James O'Keefe has been teasing that he had more "Dirt" coming on CNN, and he has now provided it for all of us to see and hear. Keep in mind that James did not send anyone into CNN undercover. The staffer who did the recording turned the video over to Project Veritas. He reveals his identity in the video. The video is almost 20 minutes long, so sit back and get comfortable.
Police Officially Charge 13-Year-Old Girl Who Pointed "Finger Gun At Classmates
A 13-year-old Kansas girl has been slapped with a felony charge for pointing a “finger gun” at her classmates. Thank God those authorities weren't around when someone else drew out their finger gun.
Beto O'Rourke Vows To Punish Churches If They Don't Support Same-Sex Marriage
When discussing politics with those on the other side of the aisle I would often comment that the Democratic party had a religious animus. I was told that wasn't true. When I pointed out the anti-faith comments by Dianne Feinstein, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders and others I was told I was reading into what they were say and making a mountain out of a mole hill. Well, now we have presidential candidate Robert Francis O'Rourke saying that he will strip churches and other organizations of their tax exempt status and stop those who oppose, don't agree with or believe in same-sex marriage. I rest my case.
But Wait, There's More Christian Bashing ...
Is Warren Making Up Her Sexist Termination Story? It Sure Looks Like It. Read More
We Did 'What We Were Told To Do by The President,' Obama
Intel Community IG Stonewalling Congress On Backdated Whistleblower Rule Change
Anti-Trump Fraternity and NeverTrump Sorority Collude in Impeachment Scam